Who Cares? Unpaid Caregiving by Sexual Identity, Gender, and Partnership Status Among U.S. Adults.

Recent scholarship indicates that sexual minority adults have higher caregiving rates than heterosexuals and that women are more likely to be caregivers than men. However, little research has addressed how gender and sexuality intersect in shaping caregiving status. This study uses data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and aggregates a probability-based sample of adults living in 36 U.S. states between 2015 and 2021. We examine who provides care among adult heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual men and women. Results reveal that women are more likely to be caregivers than men, but only among heterosexuals. We find little variation in caregiving by sexuality among women, but bisexual men are more likely than heterosexual men to be caregivers; the latter result appears to be driven by unpartnered, bisexual men. Lastly, we contextualize caregivers' experiences and reveal selected descriptive differences in patterns of care recipient-caregiver relationships across gender and sexual identity groups. Our findings advance understanding of caregiving and changing family ties in an era of population aging and increasing diversity in sexual identities.

Contextual Influences on Nonresponse to Health Survey Questions About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.

Purpose: We examined the relationship between state context and survey nonresponse to sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) questions. Methods: We obtained data from the 2014-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. Item nonresponse was defined as selecting "don't know/not sure" or "refused" for each of two questions about SO and GI. Nonresponse patterns included responding to both SO and GI questions; responding only to the SO question (nonresponse to GI); responding only to the GI question (nonresponse to SO); and responding to neither question. State-level contextual measures included legal protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or other sexual or gender minority (LGBT+) people, LGBT+ social movement strength, and public opinion regarding LGBT+ issues. Results: The analysis included 1,459,525 respondents from 44 states (190 state-years). On weighted analysis, 96.5% of adults answered both SO/GI questions, 2.4% responded only to GI, 0.4% responded only to SO, and 0.7% responded to neither. The demographic profile of individuals with GI-only nonresponse differed markedly from the profile of adults with SO-only nonresponse. An increasingly favorable legal climate for LGBT+ people was associated with greater rates of response to SO and GI questions. However, a more LGBT+ friendly state climate measured by social movement strength or public opinion was not consistently associated with reduced SO and GI question nonresponse. Conclusion: Contextual factors have mixed association with nonresponse to SO and GI question on BRFSS surveys. Our results warrant continued development of health survey questionnaires to elicit accurate information on respondents' SO and GI.

Transgender Adults Have Higher Rates Of Disability Than Their Cisgender Counterparts.

In the US population, the burden of disability among transgender adults compared with their cisgender peers is largely unknown. This study used seven years of pooled cross-sectional data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to examine how disability varies by gender across age groups. I present a series of nested logistic regression models to show the adjusted probability of disability among adults. Transgender adults have a higher probability of reporting a disability compared with cisgender men and women. After confounders are controlled for, transgender adults have a 27 percent chance of having at least one disability at age twenty and a 39 percent chance at age fifty-five, which is nearly twice the rate of their cisgender counterparts at both ages. The findings show the importance of considering disability from a life-course perspective, the effect of intersectional identities on disability risk, and the urgency of targeted health interventions for transgender people in the US.